DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN METHODS OF COST ACCOUNTING: COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS
Abstract
Introduction. In a market environment, each management entity aspires to receive such information that would provide him with the opportunity of substantiation and acceptance of effective managerial decisions. An important part of such information is the cost information. Expenses are one of the most important economic categories, which reflect the information necessary for the formation of the price of the manufactured product, provision and profit growth, and the adoption of effective management decisions. The transition of a number of domestic enterprises to the international standards of financial reporting and accounting requires improvement of the current accounting policy, methods and forms of management of the enterprise and its expenses. Methods. Dialectical and systematic approaches are used according to the goal to study cost accounting methods; abstract and logical method for determining the most promising methods of cost accounting. Results. The normative method of cost accounting, the peculiarity of which is the orientation to relatively stable and immutable conditions, is used the most widely at domestic enterprises. But at present, market factors, the effect of which can not be foreseen within the framework of the use of the normative method, which necessitates the practical processing of a more diverse methodical cost accounting device, has a significant impact on the level of expenses. Foreign experience proves the effectiveness of many new methods of accounting for costs at domestic enterprises. Discussion. Research of domestic and foreign methods of cost accounting is necessary for further improvement of cost accounting in Ukraine. The recommendations and proposals proposed in the study will contribute to increasing the efficiency of cost management at domestic enterprises through the use of foreign experience in cost accounting.
Tsaruk, V. (2017). Domestic and Foreign Methods of Cost Accounting: Comparative Characteristics. The Institute of Accounting, Control and Analysis in the Globalization Circumstances, (1-2), 49–57. doi: 10.35774/ibo2017.01.049
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF
References
Bruhans'kyj, R. F., & Skyrpan, O. P. (2014). Buhgalters'kyj oblik [Accounting]. Ternopil' : TNEU.
Dorozhenko, L. I.(2014). Suchasni metody obliku vytrat u konteksti zarubizhnogo dosvidu [Modern methods of cost accounting in the context of foreign experience]. Derzhava ta regiony. Ser.: Ekonomika ta pidpryjemnyctvo. 2014. № 2. S.72-76
Korol'ova O. I. Oblik vytrat vyrobnyctva: problemy ta perspektyvy [Accounting of production costs: problems and prospects]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnja na transporti. 2015. Vypusk 1. S.79-90
Lepetan, I. (2014). Metody obliku vytrat: vitchyznjanyj ta zarubizhnyj dosvid [Cost accounting methods: domestic and foreign experience]. Retrivied from http://sophus.at.ua/publ/2014_12_16_lutsk/sekcija_2_2014_12_16/metodi_obliku_vitrat_vitchiznjanij_ta_zarubizhnij_d osvid/75-1-0-1147
Pasternak, O. P. (2015). Vybir metodiv obliku vytrat osnovnoi' dijal'nosti dlja potreb upravlinnja [The choice of methods for recording the costs of core activities for management needs]. Global'ni ta nacional'ni problemy ekonomiky, 5, 1019-1024. Retrivied from http://global-national.in.ua/archive/5-2015/207.pdf
Polozhennja (standart) buhgalters'kogo obliku 16 «Vytraty». [Position (standard) of accounting 16 "Expenses". Ministry Finance of Ukraine Act, 559] (1999). Retrivied from httr://zakon.rada.gov.ua.
Sopko, V., Gucajljuk, Z., Shhyrba, M., & Ben'ko, M. (2005). Buhgalters'kyj oblik [Accounting]. Ternopil' : Aston.
Suk, L. K., & Suk, P. L. (2016). Finansovyj oblik [Financial Accounting]. Kyi'v : Znannja.
Tovstopjat Ju., Chernyshova N. (2014). Metody obliku vytrat vyrobnyctva ta kal'kuljuvannja sobivartosti produkcii' [Methods of accounting for production costs and calculating the cost of production]. Podatkovyj kodeks, 22. Retrivied from https://i.factor.ua/ukr/journals/nk/2014/november/issue-22/article-3441.html
Farion, I. D., & Pysarenko, T.M. (2012). Upravlins'kyj oblik [Managerial Accounting]. Kyiv : Centr uchbovoi' literatury.
Shmatkovs'ka T. (2016). Al'ternatyvni varianty vyboru metodiv kal'kuljuvannja sobivartosti za stadijamy zhyttjevogo cyklu produkcii' v systemi upravlinnja neoborotnymy aktyvamy pidpryjemstva na innovacijnyh zasadah. [Alternative options for selecting methods for calculating the cost of production stages in the life cycle of products in the system of management of irreversible assets of the enterprise on an innovative basis]. Naukovyj visnyk Odes'kogo nacional'nogo ekonomichnogo universytetu, 1, 189-203.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/ibo2017.01.049
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
