SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS FOR CONTROL THEORY DEVELOPMENT

Mykhailo Pushkar

Abstract


Introduction. The current control can’t effectively influence the practical organization of macro and micro levels of economic management due to significant gap between the theory and practical needs. The lack of a well-developed theory generates chaos in control activities in the country and destructive processes in the economic sectors of the country and business. Lax control provokes corruption and irresponsibility of the personnel for the implication of decisions. Methods. Research methods of modern control theory are based on general, economic and special learning techniques of trends and patterns of science study development, philosophy, history, sociology, methodology, achievements in different sciences that can be adopted for intellectualization of control process. Cognition is impossible without dialectical thinking that takes into consideration the specific nature of control employees work and its disclosure in the theory of control. The performance of control functions is quite problematic without scientific concepts of controlling staff training, shape of their worldview and creation of effective system of control. Results. The results of the research study on the theory of control demonstrate extremely low intellectual level of scientific generalization of control process that is aimed to elevate to higher standards. Imperfections in accounting system provide little information for the control and make it ineffective. Control is limited by the set of economic indicators that generates accounting. That is why it only determines the validity of operation instead of studying the effectiveness of management and control processes. Discussion. The author suggests that the control development perspective considers the creation of such a theory, which is based on the principles of learning theory that provides a completely new approach to perception of such categories as control, structure of its system, functions, tasks, goals, the methodology and other items.

Keywords


system of accounting; accounting; science; theory of knowledge; management; development perspectives

Full Text:

PDF>PDF

References


Kocheryn, E.A. (1974). Kontrol' v sisteme upravlenija socialisticheskim proizvodstvom Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Control in the system of management of socialist production. Questions of theory and practice]. Moskow : Jekonomyka. [in Rus.]

Vydiapyn, V.H., & Barsukova, Y.V. (1988). Teoryia fynansovo-khoziaistvennoho kontrolia [Theory of financial and economic control]. Moskow : MYNKh. [in Rus.]

Bilukha, M.T. (1996). Teoriia finansovo-hospodarskoho kontroliu i audytu [Theory of financial and economic control and audit]. Kyiv : PP «Vlad i Vlada». [in Ukranian]

Shevchuk, V.O. (1998). Kontrol hospodarskykh system v suspilstvi z perekhidnoiu ekonomikoiu (problemy teorii, orhanizatsii, metodolohii): monohrafiia [Control of economic systems in a society with a transitional economy (problems of theory, organization, methodology): monograph]. Kyiv : KDTEU. [in Ukranian]

Yaroshenko, S.P., Pinkas, H.I., & Kobycheva, O.S. (2007). Teoretychni i metodolohichni osnovy kontroliu monohrafiia [Theoretical and methodological basis of control: monograph]. Sumy : VTD «Universytetska knyha».[in Ukranian]

Vyhovska, N.H. (2008). Hospodarskyi kontrol v Ukraini: teoriia, metodolohiia, orhanizatsiia : monohrafiia [Economic control in Ukraine: theory, methodology, organization: monograph]. Zhytomyr : ZhDTU. [in Ukranian]

Redchenko, K.I. (2011). Kontrol i audyt na stratehichnomu rivni upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom : monohrafiia [Control and audit at the strategic level of enterprise management: monograph]. Lviv : LKA. [in Ukranian]

Pushkar, M. S. (2011). Teoriia piznannia u rozvytku nauky pro kontrol: monohrafiia [Theory of knowledge in the development of the science of control: monograph]. Ternopil : Kart-blansh. [in Ukranian]

Starish, O. H. (2005). Systemolohiia [Systemology]. Kyiv : TsNL. [in Rus.]

Malkei, M. (1983). Nauka y sotsyolohyia znanyia: per. s anhl. A.L. Velykovycha [Science and the sociology of knowledge (A.L. Velykovych, Transl.)]. Moskow : Prohress. [in Rus.]

Kun, T. (2009). Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij perev. Naletov Y.Z. [Structure of scientific revolutions (O.F. Naletova, Transl)]. Moskow : AST. [in Rus.]

Mohylevskyi, V.D. (1999). Metodologija sistem: verbal'nyj podhod [Methodology of systems: a verbal approach]. Moskow : Jekonomika. [in Rus.]

Rach, V., Rasoshanska, O., & Medvedieva, O. (2011). Pobudova terminolohichnoi systemy orhanizatsii naukovoho piznannia [The construction of the terminological system of organization of scientific knowledge]. Naukovyi svit, 4, 13-16. [in Ukranian]

Rozental, M.M. (Ed.) (1972). Fylosofskyi slovar. yzd. 3-e [Philosophical dictionary]. Moskow : Polytyzdat, 1972. [in Rus.]

Orban-Lembryk, L.E. (2003). Psykholohiia upravlinnia [Psychology of management]. Kyiv : Akademvydav. [in Ukranian]

Falmer, Robert M. (1992). Kontrol kak funktsyia upravlenyia. This is a chapter [Control as a function of management. In Bekov, Kh.A., & Volodyna, N.P. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of modern management in five volumes]. Moskow : VIPKjenergo. [in Rus.]

Shvyrev, V.S. (1984). Nauchnoe znanye kak deiatelnost [Scientific knowledge as an activity]. Moskow : Polytyzdat. [in Rus.]

Pushkar, M.S. (2007). Anatomiia biznesu v informatsiinomu poli pidpryiemstva: monohrafiia [Anatomy of business in the information field of the enterprise: monograph]. Ternopil : Kart-blansh. [in Ukranian]

Pushkar, M.S., & Chumachenko, M.H. (2011). Idealna systema oblvku: kontseptsiia, arkhitektura, informatsiia: monohrafiia [Ideal system of the field: concept, architecture, information: monograph]. Ternopil : Kartblansh. [in Ukranian]




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/ibo2017.03.007

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Ліцензія Creative Commons

"Scientific Club "SOPHUS"
West Ukrainian National University
Higher Education Institution "Podillia State University"